Africa's Complex Stance on the Israel-Palestinian Conflict

The Israel-Palestinian conflict has woven a complex web in Africa, where historical ties, evolving economic interests, and geopolitical considerations have led to a divided stance.

In the 1960s, as African countries shed the yoke of brutal colonial rule, they passionately aligned with the Palestinian movement in solidarity against Israel. The struggle of Palestinians uprooted from their land and homes in 1948 resonated deeply with a continent grappling with its history of oppression and resistance. The Organization of African Unity (OAU) severed ties with Israel after the 1973 October War, reflecting the widespread sympathy for the Palestinian cause.

Algeria, in particular, emerged as a prominent critic of Israel on the continent. This strong stance can be traced back to historical connections. Algeria's ties to Palestine run deep, with a historical backdrop that includes the 1988 Palestinian Declaration of Independence in Algiers. The shared Islamic faith and a history marred by French colonialism have further solidified these emotional and historical bonds. Algeria's relationship with Palestine has always been a cornerstone of its foreign policy.

In contrast, post-apartheid South Africa, having fought its own battle against racial segregation, strongly supported the Palestinian struggle. The late Nelson Mandela famously drew parallels between the South African anti-apartheid movement and the fight against Israel's occupation. This has spurred the South African government and civil society to advocate for Palestinian rights. South Africa is Israel's biggest trading partner in Africa, with substantial trade links that include machinery, electronics, and chemicals.

However, Africa's stance on the Israel-Palestinian conflict has shifted in recent years. Israel's prowess in agriculture and technology and its growing efforts to foster closer economic ties with the continent have swayed several African nations. Israel has positioned itself as a global leader in agricultural technology, which is highly attractive to African countries facing challenges related to food security, droughts, floods, and extreme weather conditions. This has led to several African countries separating their economic interests from their political positions.

One pivotal moment that altered the trajectory of Africa's engagement with Israel was the Camp David Accords of 1978, which saw Egypt, a major African nation, signing a peace deal with Israel. This historic development prompted many other African nations to reconsider their stance on Israel.

Today, 44 of 54 African countries recognize Israel's statehood, with nearly 30 opening embassies or consulates in Tel Aviv. Israel's influence in Africa extends beyond agriculture to encompass trade and security cooperation, further strengthening its foothold. For instance, Israel has provided humanitarian aid to Ethiopia for many years, and thousands of Ethiopian Jews have made their way to Israel. Israel's international aid agency, Mashav, has also trained African students in agriculture and medicine and supported entrepreneurship in Senegal.

However, Africa's stance on the Israel-Palestinian conflict remains divided. While many African countries are increasingly inclined to separate their economic interests from their political positions, significant divisions persist. Some African nations, rooted in deep historical and emotional ties to the Palestinian cause, support Palestine vehemently. Despite the growing normalization of relations with Israel, there are lingering setbacks. Israel's bid for observer status in the African Union (AU) was temporarily suspended, highlighting the ongoing influence of countries with strong historical ties to Palestine. Palestine has maintained its AU Observer Status since 2013.

The Israel-Palestinian conflict remains a contentious issue in Africa, with no uniform stance across the continent. Recent developments, including the renewal of the conflict, have brought these divisions into sharp relief. Some African leaders, like Kenya's President William Ruto, have voiced unequivocal support for Israel and condemned terrorism in the region. Meanwhile, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has expressed concerns about the escalation of violence and called for restraint, citing the illegal occupation and desecration of religious sites as factors contributing to the conflict. The varying positions of the African governments on the conflict mirror the broader division on the continent.

Africa's response to the Israel-Palestinian conflict is marked by a delicate equilibrium between historical allegiances, economic incentives, and evolving geopolitical dynamics. As the conflict persists, this division will likely remain a defining aspect of Africa's engagement with the Middle East. Africa's leaders' statements reflect this division, highlighting the multifaceted nature of the continent's stance on the Israel-Palestinian conflict. 

#StayTunedForMore